-
已有(33)人发表了评论
- 0 回复 举报 [ 34楼 正常发布 ] 发表于
- 怎么都争相写英语。这样的英语投到Science怕是也发不了。
26楼 游客(99.101.x.x): After some preliminary research, I realized that this discovery is not of too important anyway. The so-called "mass-less electron" is nothing but a wave resonance effect of the orbiting electrons in a crystal. There are many similar discoveries that have the same root. For example, Stanford Zhi-xun's 2014 proposed a new material (CdAs) for IC connection wire which is also based on the so-called "mass-less electron" of the same principle. This discovery will help to shrink IC size and reduce power, but for quantum computing, there is nothing particular fit yet.
- 0 回复 举报 [ 33楼 游客 (99.102.x.x) ] 发表于
- 正确！已经搞明白了：犹太人的爪牙上海帮要把一个浙江人扶正成为自己在华科技界的头子，代理人。但是众科技人员不服，于是就制造一个借口以便打压哪些非上海帮的科技骨干。
28楼 游客(99.101.x.x): It seems both teams were coordinated to play a game.
- 0 回复 举报 [ 32楼 游客 (99.105.x.x) ] 发表于
29楼 游客(99.101.x.x): Monopole? you can only say "as if".
- 0 回复 举报 [ 31楼 游客 (99.105.x.x) ] 发表于
26楼 游客(99.101.x.x): After some preliminary research, I realized that this discovery is not of too much importance anyway. The so-called "mass-less electron" is nothing but a wave resonance effect of the orbiting electrons in a crystal. There are many similar discoveries that have the same root. For example, Stanford Zhi-xun's 2014 proposed a new material (CdAs) for IC connection wire which is also based on the so-called "mass-less electron" of the same principle. This discovery will help to shrink IC size and reduce power, but for quantum computing, there is nothing particularly fit yet.
- 0 回复 举报 [ 27楼 游客 (99.101.x.x) ] 发表于
17楼 游客(99.105.x.x): If that is the reason, then I have no sympathy for them. They should lose for them to learn a lesson.
- 0 回复 举报 [ 26楼 游客 (99.101.x.x) ] 发表于
- After some preliminary research, I realized that this discovery is not of too important anyway. The so-called "mass-less electron" is nothing but a wave resonance effect of the orbiting electrons in a crystal. There are many similar discoveries that have the same root. For example, Stanford Zhi-xun's 2014 proposed a new material (CdAs) for IC connection wire which is also based on the so-called "mass-less electron" of the same principle. This discovery will help to shrink IC size and reduce power, but for quantum computing, there is nothing particular fit yet.
- 0 回复 举报 [ 24楼 游客 (76.102.x.x) ] 发表于
- 也不能说绝对不是，但如果你以为认识编辑部的人就好发文章那就大错特错了。不要把中国腐败思维用在这里。但是如果认识领域内权威人士，则可能稿件被尽快审阅这倒是真的。
12楼 游客(160.3.x.x): 在美国发表文章也需要关系的。
- 0 回复 举报 [ 23楼 游客 (76.102.x.x) ] 发表于
- 放屁
19楼 游客(99.105.x.x): American first that is always the rule of thumb, but of course.
- 0 回复 举报 [ 20楼 游客 (71.80.x.x) ] 发表于
- 别说烂英文吧
17楼 游客(99.105.x.x): If that is the reason, then I have no sympathy on them. They should lose for them to learn a lessen.
- 0 回复 举报 [ 19楼 游客 (99.105.x.x) ] 发表于
- American first that is always the rule of thumb, but of course.
12楼 游客(160.3.x.x): 在美国发表文章也需要关系的。
- 0 回复 举报 [ 18楼 游客 (99.105.x.x) ] 发表于
- Of course they can still publish it international with minor revision.
14楼 游客(160.3.x.x): 现在崇洋媚外严重。在国内期刊发了，还能在海外发表吗
- 0 回复 举报 [ 17楼 游客 (99.105.x.x) ] 发表于
- If that is the reason, then I have no sympathy on them. They should lose for them to learn a lessen.
15楼 游客(160.3.x.x): 你在Science上发表一篇文章能得到的好处（我说的是从学校、单位得到的好处），不是国内期刊文章能比的
- 0 回复 举报 [ 16楼 游客 (99.105.x.x) ] 发表于
- That is the root issue! Why Chinese look down upon themselves?
4楼 游客(66.87.x.x): 不会在自己的刊物上先发表？祟洋过分了。论文有内容谁都会承认。