发表评论 评论 (131 个评论)
- 1 回复 whyuask
- 是的，对64事件的分析其实不宜放在纪念64的这天，哀悼的情感不应该被打扰……死难者几乎都是真挚而勇敢的人
xinsheng: 这样的分析比较理性也许被认为冷血。
无论怎么说，6.4是一场悲剧，哀悼6.4亡灵，希望悲剧永远不再重演。
- 1 回复 iamcaibird
- 64当时的一个情绪就是如柴玲说的，用鲜血来唤醒民众。剩下的发展就是按这个情绪走的。
- 1 回复 饱暖思平等
- David,
Did you know there are some people who are called "WUMAO" in China and America? They are employed by the CCP goverment or hired by themself to boost the CCP goverment directly or indirectly. Did you know someone who interviewed you is that kind of person?
Please forward this short message to David.
- 1 回复 老君岩
- Politically correct with an air of faux sophistication, he is the embodiment of what's wrong with America today.
- 1 回复 谔谔
- 89那批大学生傻啊，从小接受的教育就被欺骗，比如“以天下为己任”“忠于国家忠于党”“正直”“不怕流血牺牲”，都是看着《上甘岭》这样的片子长大的，受毒害太深，谁他妈的知道这个“天下”和他半毛钱的关系都没有，自作多情的去爱党爱国，去清除腐败，谁他妈的知道党国不爱他，就是腐败要搞他们的命！谁他妈的知道他们照所学的去践行，射过来的就是党国的子弹。
这个老外的话不对，一个执政党，你教育人民的是什么价值观？你没有教育他们要妥协要退让要保命，你教育的是要“勇于牺牲”要“不怕流血牺牲”要“不向恶势力低头”要“敢于斗争勇于斗争”，你这个共党他妈的漂亮话都教给学生们了，学生们做的言行一致，完全是党教育的，现在你他妈的翻脸啦，向这些你曾经认为的好学生开枪啦，有这种道理吗？这个老外没有考虑教育因素，中国的教育和美国的教育是不同的，中国的教育封建意味很浓，教育老百姓要“愚忠”的。64一过，谁都明白了，讲一套做一套，信用破产了。错完全在党国政府，因为学生做的完全是你政府教育的一套东西，目标也不是推翻政府，是政府背弃了教育人民的价值观翻脸杀人不讲信义。
- 1 回复 myscorpionus
- David, you sound like you were there. But you were not. There was no plan, never, people just want what their right of a clean government and nothing more. You said "A person with gun come into the store and says " you can leave, or i will shoot you". You compare a robber to government troops with tanks? Might be you are right. Some how I feel your answers are from the propaganda dept of the GCD. Hope you paid for the copy right! People who pulled the trigger will pay for what they did sooner or later.
- 1 回复 myscorpionus
- David, Kent State shooting cannot compare to June 4th. Kent State Shooting resulted from individual gunmen where June 4th is a decision from the top. You need to study US history more, how did you get to be a former US official? For information on Kent State go to : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings
