注册 登录
倍可亲 返回首页

ryu的个人空间 https://www.backchina.com/u/282517 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

记录

REUTERS报:昨日深夜从奥克兰飞往中国上海的新西兰航空NZ289航班因中国没准该客机落地机今上午10时原机返回
  • ryu: NZ289航班载客270人,新西兰航空已向旅客致歉,中国外交部对此未表评论,中国民用航空局也无答复。 (2-10 16:03)
  • ryu: 新西兰航空公司一周内已有两架班机被迫折返,联合报记者田思怡报道。 (2-10 16:09)
  • ryu: 9日晚上从奥克兰起飞的NZ航289班机上的乘客、纽约大学上海分校助理教授Eric Hundman告诉新西兰前锋报说,飞机近午夜时准时起飞,但在半途中机长通知,中国当局未批准这班飞机降落,我们必须折返。 (2-10 16:11)
  • ryu: Hundman说,飞机在10日早上9点半返回奥克兰。11点半过后Hundman收到新航发的简讯:如同你在机上得到的讯息,你搭乘的这班飞机未获准在中国降落,被要求返回奥克兰。 (2-10 16:14)
  • ryu: 新西兰航空一名发言人告诉前锋报:我们了解乘客对这种情况深感失望和沮丧,我们很抱歉打乱了他们的旅行计划。 (2-10 16:15)
  • ryu: Eric Hundman,Assistant Professor 助理教授 @NYUShanghai. 中文通, ex-physicist, sci-fi geek. Social networks, the military, foreign policy, and strategy in China and Taiwan (2-10 16:17)
  • ryu: 23分钟前Hundman发推致友:My conversations today have indicated that carriers need permits generally, and individual planes also need to be registered. (2-10 16:19)
  • ryu: 他还说,I’ve just experienced a new level of China Bad: midway through our flight from Auckland to Shanghai, the pilot informs us that Chinese authorities had not given this plane permission to land, (2-10 16:21)
  • ryu: so we needed to turn around. A permitting issue, supposedly. (2-10 16:21)
  • ryu: Many thought I meant to blame China for this fiasco, which I didn’t -  still very unclear to me who is at fault. Another data point, though: @FlyAirNZ has just offered us a “gesture of goodwill” in (2-10 16:22)
  • ryu: the form of a NZD200 voucher, in addition to the hotel rooms they arranged earlier (2-10 16:22)
  • ryu: Yea, I meant to convey a bad China experience, not to indicate China is clearly to blame. (Though that was how the pilots framed it in their announcement, which I attempted to convey.) (2-10 16:23)
2019-2-10 16:01 回复|

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2003-2013 Backchina.com

返回顶部