在飞行员协会的工作----国家驾联关于Akara-Fukue空中走廊及RVSM的讨论

作者:roy737  于 2007-7-29 12:20 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

作者分类:讲述厦航飞行员辞职的故事|通用分类:其它日志

 在飞行员协会的工作

---国家驾联关于Akara-Fukue空中走廊及RVSM的讨论

    在各国专家讨论的后期,由于事关中日韩以及周边路过飞机的航空安全,大家就Akara-Fukue空中走廊的问题进行了集中全面地讨论。

    目前的现状是,这个区域,ICAO划归给仁川情报区,但是实际管辖权在日本。韩国一直要求将管辖权归还韩国,日本一直坚持不给。问题是南北向的飞机B576、B586飞机以及在A593航路上出入韩国的飞机主要是由韩国指挥,A593航路上的飞机是由日本指挥,所以在这个走廊要求飞机不能改变高度,在这个航路经常出现临近飞机右不同的国家的管制区指挥的情况,正常情况下没事,应急情况下就有很大的潜在危险。

    在咨询我的意见的时候,我咨询了一些管制员和业内人士,大家的意见,主要是我们主张是SADLI是我们的边界,但是ICAO从lamen以外都划给仁川,对于SADLI以外的区域中国也从未主张。所以我个人的建议是,这个问题主要是韩国和日本之间协调,希望你们两个飞行员协会敦促各自民航主管机构协调管制权,形成统一的管理,保障安全飞行。

    后来,日本飞行员协会仅就日本的立场,在这方面对这个走廊的历史进行了一些阐述,在这里发给大家,以期大家对此问题的背景有一个了解。(他们的观点是中国政府和韩国政府的问题,推托了日本的介入)

Dear Stu and all,

 ALPA Japan had a meeting with JCAB on Akara-Fukue Corridor and Chinese RVSM on 15th. Persons who attended from JCAB were Mr. Yoshiki Imawaka, Director for International Policy Coordination ATS Systems Planning Division, and Natsuki Ibe, Chief, Operations Section, Air Traffic Control Division.

Imawaka is a person whom Stu met in the last DGCA meeting.

Our members were Koichi Sano (former RVP NOP), Tsutomu Mizozoe (Chairman of ATS Committee), Daisuke Otsuka (member of ATS Committee) and I.

 The meeting was finished in very friendly and productively mood. We clearly understood this AKARA-FUKUE Corridor problem is a political issue between Chinese and Korean Governments. Imawaka explained the history on this corridor at the beginning.

 When A593 was established by strong request of IATA on 1983, the problem of FIR boundary was not completely cleared. Korean Government recognized the west boundary of Taegue FIR (former name of Incheon FIR) was 125 degrees E (LAMEN) that had been confirmed by ICAO before China joined ICAO.

But Chinese Government had insisted 124 degrees E (SADLI) to be the East boundary of Chinese FIR after China joined ICAO.

But Chinese Government agreed the west boundary was LAMEN when established A593.  However Chinese Government still sticks to the east boundary to be SADLI even now. So, when discussing the revision of the agreement of AKARA-FUKUE Corridor, it can’t be carried without touching FIR boundary. When discussing FIR boundary, only the highest political judgment seems to solve the problem.

And even discussing new lower altitude in this corridor means the revision of the agreement for both Chinese and Korean Governments.

Imawaka said that he can't understand why Shanghai control doesn't approve crossing LAMEN at FL230 or above reaching FL250 by SADLI. It'll be better to ask this question to Chinese CAA from ALPA China.

Metric RVSM in A593 would be impossible to implement without solving many problems on this route.

 China wants to increase traffic on A593 because of Beijing Olympic and the International Trade Fair in Shanghai, etc.  Also the traffic between Korea and Hong Kong via Cheju VOR to join A593 at NIRAT and the traffic vice versa are growing in several years. There’s no direct communication line between Incheon control and Shanghai control, Fukuoka control is relaying those traffic information to Incheon control and Shanghai control.

There exist some conditions in both China and Korea that will work to solve this problem. But we seem to have nothing of effective measure at present time.

 Sharing information of ALPA China vs Chinese CAA and ALPA Korea vs Korean CAA will help other bodies to drive this issue. I want to keep a closed communication in possible range. 

 Some more about the history

At the very beginning this area was Japanese FIR. After the World War Second, all ATC system was under the rule of US Army in Japan and Korea. When finishing the rule of US Army, Korean Government insisted supported by US Army to change this area into Taegue FIR like present form. Japanese Government opposed this proposal but it was adopted by majority at ICAO Meeting on 1962.

Then the friendship between China and Japan was reestablished September 1972. Since the friendship between China and Korea was not established at that time, the first flight (August 1974) between Tokyo and Beijing took the route A1 via Kagoshima detouring Taegue FIR to the south and went up to north via Shanghai. Then it was shortened a little on1980 detouring to the south of the Thaeg FIR via Fukue. Further shorten airway A593 was established on 1983.

 Kind regards,

 Tsutomu Ishiyama



Link URL: http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/59223c7f01000be0

高兴

感动

同情

搞笑

难过

拍砖

支持

鲜花

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

roy737最受欢迎的博文
  1. 武汉贼也太多了 [2007/12]
  2. 在“下”航眼里,“华为”简直愚蠢透顶 [2007/12]
  3. 吃人的老虎是弱者,因为它就快要灭绝了----一个兄弟的高论 [2008/03]
  4. 最後他們奔我而來,卻再也沒有人站起來為我說話了。 [2008/03]
  5. 微笑着生活------自我膨胀一下,我觉得以前的文章写的挺好,再发一次 [2008/04]
  6. 一个飞行员的自述:我辞职遭遇巨额索赔705万的经历 [2008/03]
  7. 天价培训还是天价讹诈---拆穿飞行员天价培训谎言 [2008/04]
  8. 东航的事件,没有对错----克己奉公兢兢业业飞行的下场更惨 [2008/04]
  9. 历史是谁写?-----友人的贡献 [2008/04]
  10. 看了华航的飞机事故--X航还敢让发动机没有滑油运行吗? [2007/08]
  11. 高度怀疑假发票敲诈-重贴厦航培训发票,增加"开PARTY"等发票 [2008/03]
  12. 每个人都在写历史--5年10年后,历史会怎么为我们定位 [2008/03]
  13. X航无耻,兄弟们受过实在可惜,有些不忍心 [2007/08]
  14. 人性的天平 [2007/07]
  15. 当纳粹开始屠杀我时,已经没有人为我讲话了…… [2007/12]
  16. 关于号召集体请病假的事--谢谢兄弟们! [2008/03]
  17. 26号的仲裁情况---下次仲裁时间更改为3月4号 [2008/03]
  18. 正义?公正? ——仲裁再次开庭通知 [2008/02]
  19. 今天仲裁的情况---3月7号继续仲裁 [2008/03]
  20. X航的卑劣行径让我出离愤怒--灾难的大幕已经被X航拉开 [2008/02]
  21. 除了X航,还有多少“正$府”机构要被拖进这个泥潭 [2008/02]
  22. 2450元----小时费新标杆 [2008/03]
  23. 除了XX 还有多少人会为此事身败名裂 [2008/02]
  24. 明天又要开庭了 [2008/03]
  25. 圣诞快乐 [2008/02]
  26. 何为事实真相,谁在混淆视听? [2008/02]

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新:GMT+8, 2024-3-19 20:50

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心,为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部