该怎么做?

作者:fanlaifuqu  于 2016-3-31 02:05 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

作者分类:分享|通用分类:热点杂谈|已有17评论

大侠的文在头版头条,一般不会错漏。
我和大多数人的想法一致,这样的观点与趋势不知是否和大侠的担忧有关联。把今天的新闻放上来,元芳,你说呢?

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe torture can be justified to extract information from suspected terrorists, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, a level of support similar to that seen in countries like Nigeria where militant attacks are common.

The poll reflects a U.S. public on edge after the massacre of 14 people in San Bernardino in December and large-scale attacks in Europe in recent months, including a bombing claimed by the militant group Islamic State last week that killed at least 32 people in Belgium.

Donald Trump, the front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, has forcefully injected the issue of whether terrorism suspects should be tortured into the election campaign.

Trump has said he would seek to roll back President Barack Obama's ban on waterboarding - an interrogation technique that simulates drowning that human rights groups contend is illegal under the Geneva Conventions. Trump has also vowed to "bring back a hell of a lot worse" if elected.

Most Americans are more concerned about security and defeating the Islamic State than they are about privacy rights, a new Morning Consult poll finds.

A whopping 71% of respondents said they supported requiring companies like Facebook, Apple and Google to give law enforcement access to their personal information. And 76% want those companies to assist in terror-related investigations. Two-thirds want them to turn over information so the government can identify and monitor potential terrorists.

Those numbers belie tech companies’ recent stances against providing such information after federal authorities asked Apple to help them get into an iPhone used by a San Bernardino shooter. The Department of Justice dropped its request Monday after finding another way to access the phone.

The Morning Consult poll, which surveyed voters in the days following the terror attacks in Brussels last week, also found half of Americans support temporarily banning foreign Muslim from entering the United States, a move espoused by Republican front-runner Donald Trump.

 And 49% support stepped up patrols of Muslim neighborhoods, which Texas Sen. Ted Cruz has recommended.

The balance between privacy and security has become a flashpoint in recent months as Republican candidates have proposed more intrusive methods to thwart attacks.

Here are some other interesting findings from the poll:

• 78% support an added layer of security outside airports

• 75% support increasing funding for the Transportation Security Administration

• 84% support increased training for TSA agents

• 81% back increasing funding for background checks on airport workers

支持对恐怖主义分子用酷刑和给政府更大的权益而不在乎自己的隐私,已渐渐成为主流!


高兴

感动

同情

搞笑
2

难过

拍砖
5

支持
10

鲜花

刚表态过的朋友 (17 人)

发表评论 评论 (17 个评论)

3 回复 小皮狗 2016-3-31 02:22
在反恐问题上,也许应防止:以点带面的扩大化,治标不治本的非人性。而对于民意支持的解读上也许应明白: “水能载舟,亦能覆舟”。
3 回复 天涯看客 2016-3-31 02:29
对恐怖分子讲人权是对普通大众人权的最大的践踏!!!!
2 回复 天涯看客 2016-3-31 02:33
我不喜欢走极端,不喜欢政府控制一切,也不喜欢Apple那样,以保护隐私为借口而不惜违抗法院法令!
3 回复 fanlaifuqu 2016-3-31 02:36
天涯看客: 我不喜欢走极端,不喜欢政府控制一切,也不喜欢Apple那样,以保护隐私为借口而不惜违抗法院法令!
apple 还是为生意着想. 你的观点和我一样.
1 回复 酸柚子 2016-3-31 02:57
我更怕政府作恶,它比恐怖分子更可怕
3 回复 jc0473 2016-3-31 03:04
既要最大范围保护人民利益又要稳准狠打击恐怖极端势力。相信在民主制度下各民族团结、智慧和力量一定能够战胜邪恶
3 回复 白露为霜 2016-3-31 03:20
"Most Americans are more concerned about security and defeating the Islamic State than they are about privacy rights,"

人民感到不安全,其他都谈不上。
2 回复 xqw63 2016-3-31 04:19
咱属于支持这个建议的一员,为了对付恐怖分子,牺牲一点个人隐私值得,而且,咱相信,这些被政府掌握的隐私,仅仅只能用于对付恐怖主义,美国会出台防止政府掌握个人隐私扩大化的法律,正像医生掌握病人个人健康隐私,不得用于和治疗疾病不相干的领域
2 回复 i0u 2016-3-31 04:35
前些日子在Flipboard上看了篇文章关于美国研究推行社区行为跟踪,希望能做到对恐怖分子的演变进行预先干预,很类似于中国当年居委会的性质,不知道能不能真的起到作用也~~对于酷刑,我的理解是医学如此发展了,应该有药物可以让人说出真话啊~~
2 回复 hu18 2016-3-31 06:42
民主诚可贵,自由价更高。若为国安故,两者皆尿脬。
2 回复 dwqdaniel 2016-3-31 06:43
jc0473: 既要最大范围保护人民利益又要稳准狠打击恐怖极端势力。相信在民主制度下各民族团结、智慧和力量一定能够战胜邪恶
说的好,最大范围保护人民利益又要稳准狠打击恐怖极端势力不矛盾,纳税人花了钱供养政府,它有义务处理好这个关系
4 回复 fanlaifuqu 2016-3-31 06:50
hu18: 民主诚可贵,自由价更高。若为国安故,两者皆尿脬。
此处尿为啥唸sui?
3 回复 hu18 2016-3-31 06:58
fanlaifuqu: 此处尿为啥唸sui?
到底是怎么回事,我也无解。印象中,北人多读NIAO,南方人(江浙沪)多念SUI。
3 回复 jc0473 2016-3-31 07:27
dwqdaniel: 说的好,最大范围保护人民利益又要稳准狠打击恐怖极端势力不矛盾,纳税人花了钱供养政府,它有义务处理好这个关系
相信人民的觉悟久经考验
2 回复 越湖 2016-3-31 11:08
酸柚子: 我更怕政府作恶,它比恐怖分子更可怕
说得好。
2 回复 ryu 2016-3-31 11:21
美国政府有纠错功能,静观吧。
1 回复 第二片云 2016-4-6 14:19
隐私诚可贵,自由价更高。若为保小命,两者都打包。中国也好米国也好,人类还是离不开达尔文的丛林法则。

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新:GMT+8, 2024-3-30 04:50

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心,为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部