Ah Ha, my post was deleted 啊哈, 发言被删除了

I usually like Mr.平凡往事's articles. They are friendly, vivid and full of fun in life.

Just read his article "通过在美国做手术的经历，感慨中国医生无德。" and made a-few-line comments saying I won't dispute his conclusion, but feeling he didn't know the medical/insurance system in this country well enough; saying I won't prefer to derive such a big conclusion based on one small case rather than statistics.  I wrote "Would I conclude that your logic used here is a typical Chinese logic/methodology? I won't, because this is only your individual methodology rather than the Chinese ethnic group's - Greetings!".

Minutes later, I went back to to check his response. Ah Ha! It was deleted!!

Can I still say that using statistics to get conclusions rather than deriving big conclusions from one case would be much more convincible?   

(I'll write it in Chinese when I'm able to.)

以上是今天上班时发生的事情。那时写不了中文，只好用蚯蚓字代替啦，抱歉～

下面是我的中文意思：

“我平时还是比较喜欢平凡先生的文章的。它们大部分友好，生动，充满生活乐趣。

刚读到他的“通过在美国做手术的经历，感慨中国医生无德”的帖子，回了一个有数行意见的帖，说我不是否认他的结论，但感觉他对美国的医疗/保险制度并不十分了解。我说我不会从这么一个小病例引申出那么大一个结论来，我会用统计数字来说话。我写道“我可以用你在这里的逻辑说明这就是典型的中国人的逻辑和方法吗？我不会，因为这仅仅是你的方法而已，它不代表华裔族群的逻辑方法论。  ——  问候！”

几分钟后，我想来看看平凡先生他的反应。啊哈！那几行字被删除了！！

我可否仍然说：使用统计数字而不是从一个案例中去派生大的结论会有说服力得多呢？