冤案竣工,这就是美国!

作者:Cannaa  于 2017-11-2 06:25 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

作者分类:真人真事|通用分类:法律相关|已有2评论

关键词:赵维武

赵维武没有律师,不懂英语,法庭上赵一说话就被法官打断。判决完全是一面之辞。
这个记者也是误导,根本没有13个录像,那时别的不相干的事扯到一起。

76岁老人会用电驴下载录像,荒唐!
Easton man convicted in rare child pornography trial
Of The Morning Call

After a rare trial where jurors viewed the videos of child sexual abuse that an Easton man was accused of downloading and sharing, the panel convicted him Wednesday on all counts after only 45 minutes of deliberation.

Weiwu Zhao, 76, was convicted of four offenses including a second-degree felony count of distributing images depicting indecent contact with children younger than 13. That means Zhao faces a maximum sentence of 29 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled Dec. 18.

Zhao was charged after investigators said they tracked a three-minute, 22-second video to Zhao’s computer, and later used a search warrant to seize the device from his West Madison Street home. A forensic analysis of the hard drive uncovered 13 other videos, police said.

Northampton County Assistant District Attorney Laura Majewski said the verdict brings justice for each of the victims whose abuse was depicted in the videos.

“It’s important for the public to understand this is not a victimless crime and each of those victims now has a voice because he has been brought to justice,” Majewski said.

While child pornography is a major target for law enforcement, very few cases go to trial and most end with a guilty plea if the evidence is not thrown out because of errors by investigators.

In Zhao’s trial, jurors saw parts of the 14 videos, which moved some to tears. Judge Jennifer Sletvold warned jurors after seeing the videos not to allow their emotions to prejudice them against Zhao.

Zhao represented himself at trial, having hired and fired three lawyers as his case wound through court. A native of China who relied on an interpreter during the trial, Zhao railed against the justice system in legal filings, claiming he is being framed and invoking racism against Asians.



高兴

感动

同情
1

搞笑

难过

拍砖

支持

鲜花

刚表态过的朋友 (1 人)

发表评论 评论 (2 个评论)

17 回复 笑臉書生 2017-11-5 05:17
在法庭上,必须听法官的,这是法律基本上常识,打断律师,陪审员,甚至于罪犯的发言,扯不上非法,无理,而是正当的执法行为!赵先生为什么没辯护律师,因为他辞退了三个“不合格”的律师,法官不许另找是对的,因赵先生作法近似无赖,三个律师都不合格嗎?
17 回复 笑臉書生 2017-11-5 05:22
要相信美国法律一相信美国法官,要相信陪审团正确判断,如何这一切都不相信,那我们能相信什么?

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

其它[法律相关]博文更多

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新:GMT+8, 2020-8-9 04:46

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心,为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部