弗吉尼亚核潜艇可能要变驼背了。

作者:kukubara  于 2013-6-3 15:39 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

通用分类:政经军事|已有1评论

美国刚公布了其陆海空核威慑三剑客的未来10年的5000亿美元预算。简单说,陆基洲际导弹预算被砍最多,几个月前传出的山寨中国地下核长城的计划肯定是没戏了。战略轰炸机携带的空中核导弹被砍预算其次,研制新的战略轰炸机的计划可能受影响。

受预算削减影响最少的战略核潜艇,美国很可能在现有弗吉尼亚攻击核潜艇加一截26米的新垂直发射导弹舱段,同时能发射常规和核弹头的洲际导弹,由于这新的中间26米身段比较高(美国弗吉尼亚攻击核潜艇是10米,洲际导弹核潜艇俄亥俄是13),弗吉尼亚核潜艇可能要变驼背了。

Nuclear Arsenal Subject to Pentagon Cuts, But New Subs May Escape Ax

By Elaine M. Grossman

May 24, 2013 | 2:47 p.m.

The Virginia-class nuclear attack submarine USS New Mexico is moored pierside during the ship's commissioning ceremony, at Naval Station Norfolk Virginia Saturday March 27, 2010. 

The U.S. nuclear arsenal might be subject to cutbacks by a major budget review under way at the Defense Department, despite enjoying relative protection this year from largely across-the-board sequester spending reductions, a senior Defense official said on Thursday.

"Every part of the program, including nuclear weapons, is being addressed," the official said in an interview, referring to the ongoing Strategic Choices and Management Review led by Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter.

The budget scrub is to advise Chuck Hagel, the defense secretary, by late this month on how best to apportion $500 billion in congressionally mandated funding reductions over the next decade. If President Obama can convince lawmakers to repeal the 2011 Budget Control Act, lesser but still-substantial cuts would likely be taken in 2014 and beyond.


The senior official -- who requested anonymity in this article to address politically and diplomatically sensitive topics -- appeared to suggest, though, that the Pentagon intends to keep ballistic missile-armed submarines relatively safe from the cost-cutting ax.

The big-ticket item coming down the pike for modernizing the Navy's aging "boomer" submarines and their Trident D-5 ballistic missiles is the estimated $90 billion Ohio-class replacement vessel, also dubbed "SSBN(X)."

"For SSBN(X), I don't see viable alternatives to going forward with the program," said the Defense leader, noting the Pentagon had already "made some significant adjustments" to program costs by delaying fielding of the first vessel by two years to 2031. "It's the most important element -- it's the central element -- of our triad."

That could leave the other two legs of the nuclear delivery arsenal -- Air Force bomber aircraft and ICBMs -- on the hot seat for reductions.

The service intends to field 80 to 100 new, conventionally armed Long-Range Strike bombers after 2020 that would later be certified for delivering nuclear weapons – though some pundits wonder if the new aircraft might remain conventional-only forever.

The Air Force insists that the bomber must be made dual-capable to help retain flexibility and redundancy in U.S. atomic forces. However, service Secretary Michael Donley acknowledged early this year that sequestration could endanger the timing or details of plans for the new airplane.

After 2030, the Air Force also plans to field a new Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent to replace today's 450 Minuteman 3 ICBMs. Here, too, the Pentagon is eyeing the potential for cutbacks, in the form of a life-extended or upgraded version of the Minuteman 3 rather than a new-design ballistic missile.

For both the ICBM and bomber legs of the triad, "we're looking at how do we sustain that capability and how do we do it at a reasonable cost, including both the delivery systems and the associated warheads and bombs," the senior Defense official told Global Security Newswire.

Speaking at a press conference on Friday, Donley said plans for the future ICBM could be at greater risk than for the next-generation bomber aircraft.

"I think [the spending review] has a little bit more effect on the ICBM side of the force structure, because on the bomber side we already know that we're going ahead with the Long-Range Strike," he told reporters. By contrast, the service is just beginning to weigh how it might replace the Minuteman 3.

Some defense analysts also see the Navy preparing its own "Plan B" for modernizing the nuclear-armed submarines.

The service is developing new strike capacity for its Virginia-class fast attack submarines that could allow the boats to launch ballistic missiles. To date the focus appears to be solely on adding conventionally armed weapons to the submersibles.

However, the "Virginia Payload Module" proposals to modify the current submarine design with a nearly 94-foot center section for ballistic-missile launch tubes appear strikingly similar to an alternative the Navy earlier dismissed for replacing the nuclear-armed Ohio-class submarines.

Some analysts argue the Navy should transition its atomic missiles to a smaller vessel such as the attack submarines at a time when traditional Cold War nuclear threats are receding. The Navy, though, said several years ago that the "humpback" center compartment required for the Virginia-class submarines to carry Trident ballistic missiles would reduce the vessels' speed, maneuverability and stealth.

No total program cost has been estimated for the proposed Virginia modification, but Navy budget documents show a price tag of nearly $800 million between 2013 and 2018 alone.

In terms of the size of the nuclear force, some Republicans on Capitol Hill have warned Obama against taking unilateral reductions below levels agreed by the Washington and Moscow in the New START accord, which allows each side 1,550 fielded strategic warheads and 700 fielded delivery vehicles.

They have also threatened to block implementation of the 2011 treaty if the administration does not make good on plans to modernize today's nuclear warheads and delivery systems.

The senior Defense official this week said the Pentagon's budget review -- nicknamed the "Skimmer" in keeping with its acronym -- would not itself address the policy option of nuclear reductions below New START levels.

However, the new assessment is being carried out in the "context" of "existing and pending policy guidance," the official said in the Pentagon interview.

"Pending" policy guidance would include a document currently sitting at the Oval Office for approval: The so-called "NPR Implementation Study," which is believed to recommend changes to nuclear doctrine and targeting that could form the basis for a smaller nuclear arsenal numbering 1,100 or fewer warheads.

"The conclusions are with the president," the senior official said of the implementing study, which was based on findings published in the Pentagon-led 2010 Nuclear Posture Review. "And when he says he has no more questions, and he signs, then we're done."

Donley said Obama will make a significant determination in summer 2014 regarding exactly how the New START reductions will be taken.

"The department and the nation's way forward on this still is dependent on some national-level decisions that the president plans, as I understand, to make next year," he said at the press briefing.

The bomber, said the outgoing Air Force secretary, "is really independent, in some respects, from the nuclear decisions that are still pending," because it also has a crucial conventional-attack role.

Meanwhile, plans for a new-design replacement for nuclear-armed submarines appear here to stay.

"As we look at the budgetary and fiscal environment that we're going to have for the next decade-plus, the department's going to have to make hard choices," the senior Defense official said on Thursday. "Sustaining a safe, secure and effective nuclear deterrent is a critical mission. Sustaining the sea-based element … with the follow-on to Ohio-class is critical for that."

The official acknowledged there is "still a significant cost" to plans for developing and buying 12 SSBN(X) vessels, despite the planned two-year delay in introducing them into the fleet.

Can the nation afford to build ballistic missile capability into two different families of submarines -- the Virginia class and the Ohio-class replacement -- during a time of fiscal austerity?

The senior official sounded slightly less committed when it came to the possible introduction of big conventionally tipped missiles for the Virginia attack submarines.

"Preserving our capability as a nation to undertake non-nuclear strikes is also critically important, both for operational capabilities and indeed as we think about our strategy over time to sustain advantage" over possible adversaries, the official said. "Sustaining, if not increasing, our non-nuclear strike capacity even in a time of budgetary austerity is something that the Department needs to at least tee up … for this and future secretaries."

Donley said the ongoing review could result in dusting off some previously jettisoned defense procurement alternatives in the interest of curbing spending.

"There are ways to address different aspects of the nuclear enterprise and how to modernize it and how much and on what schedule," he said on Friday. "We have lots of options for that. There are many programs involved."

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?227204-Nuclear-Arsenal-Subject-to-Pentagon-Cuts-But-New-Subs-May-Escape-Ax

 


高兴

感动

同情

搞笑

难过

拍砖

支持

鲜花

发表评论 评论 (1 个评论)

2 回复 随心而安 2013-6-3 18:43
美国就算军事停滞个十年也还是全球第一,每年这么多钱砸进去,也就是让军火商赚的爽。

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

kukubara最受欢迎的博文
  1. 澳洲70岁老汉为娶泰国小三,杀42岁中国妻后用硫酸在垃圾桶里溶尸灭迹 ... [2013/12]
  2. 陈震阳才是“朱令中毒”这个悲剧的真正制造者 [2013/05]
  3. 中国房市泡沫?你显然被忽悠了。 [2013/06]
  4. 美海军朱姆沃尔特万吨舰的上层建筑从复合材料改成钢 [2013/08]
  5. 看富裕的澳洲人怎样哭穷: 三分之二大学生生活在贫困线以下? ... [2013/07]
  6. 叙利亚叛军使用中国红箭8导弹 [2013/06]
  7. 原来那个惊掉下巴的传言是邓文迪和英国前首相布莱尔有婚外情 ... [2013/06]
  8. 弗吉尼亚核潜艇可能要变驼背了。 [2013/06]
  9. 30多年后中国东风3弹道导弹仍在沙特虎视眈眈伊朗,以色列 [2013/07]
  10. 随想:65年中国战机击落美机 被美机碎片崩51个洞 [2013/06]
  11. 星星还是那个星星,月亮还是那个月亮,美国不再是那个美国。。。 ... ... [2012/11]
  12. 制造和设计的区别:彭丽媛在美国用iphone,奥巴马不敢 [2013/12]
  13. 美国每周有5位父母被亲生子女杀害 [2013/12]
  14. 陈震阳的‘鉈中毒’结论是严重错误的 [2013/05]
  15. 美国海军成功降落x47b无人机于航空母舰,史上第一次 [2013/07]
  16. 德国将退役f4鬼怪式战斗机 [2013/06]
  17. 意大利花10亿美元建f35战机总装厂,豪赌西欧战机的前途 [2013/06]
  18. 这张照片说明澳洲华人大选中应该投陆克文一票 [2013/06]
  19. 哈飞运12f,能否早日完成海监型,航母型? [2013/06]
  20. 如果这是中国,恐怕八国联军都来了 [2013/05]
  21. 华人尚不富裕,同胞仍需努力 [2013/06]

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新:GMT+8, 2020-8-9 13:34

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心,为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部