美国纳粹科技谍战热片/华裔总统以人为本进军2020

作者:change?  于 2019-2-17 04:57 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

通用分类:博你一笑



非常好看的电影,因为他不是那末美国的好莱坞故事,紧张不断,意外丛生,对话俏皮,人物酷毙,看完这种电影,不觉得今天的人性等方面更进步。

<披风和匕首>是1946年由Fritz Lang执导的黑色电影,由Gary Cooper主演。与13 Rue Madeleine一样,这是对第二次世界大战期间被占领欧洲战略服务办公室(OSS)运营的致敬。这个标题是基于1946年的非小说类书“披风和匕首:O.S.S(中央情报局前身)的秘密故事”。作者:Corey Ford和Alastair MacBain。前OSS特工E. Michael Burke担任技术顾问

电影的主演是大明星Gary Cooper, 但令人永难忘却是女主角Lilli Palmer。女演员莉莉·帕尔默(Lilli Palmer)于1914年5月24日在普鲁士波森(Posen,Prussia)出生,饰演Lilli Marie Peiser,是一位迷人,优雅,极受欢迎的国际电影明星,拥有温柔,低调的美丽。她是奥地利犹太女演员Rose Lissman和德国犹太人外科医生Alfred Peiser的女儿。除了她的母语德语,她从小就能说流利的法语和英语。Lilli在柏林学习戏剧,并于1932年在18岁时在那里首次亮相。然而,在短时间内,随着希特勒的崛起,这个家庭被迫逃离故乡。最终莉莉搬到了英国,重建了她在舞台和电影上开始的职业生涯。

1945年搬到美国,以进一步发展自己的事业。雷克斯和莉莉成为了一对着名的表演夫妻,在电影中,他们共同主演了一部阴暗的人物The Long Dark Hall(1951)和更出色的The Four Poster(1952),后来引发了音乐改编“I Do!I Do!”。 Lilli凭借这一表演获得威尼斯电影节奖,并与其他英俊的男演员合作伙伴表现得很好,特别是Gary Cooper在她的首张美国电影Cloak and Dagger(1946)和John Garfield的经典拳击电影Body and Soul(1947)让观众着迷其中一个较新的外国进口产品。

丈夫哈里森在小报中所熟知的那样. 与女演员Carole Landis的一场特别灾难性的浪漫导致了这位女演员在1948年的悲惨自杀.Lilli 选择高姿态对待,并在公众眼中走得更好。然而,她最终离开了哈里森和好莱坞,并于1954年回到欧洲。1956年,莉莉拍摄了[时间与永恒之间](1956年),并爱上了英俊的阿根廷联合主演卡洛斯汤普森,ta在德国开发了matinée偶像身份。他们于1957年9月结婚,她与哈里森离婚几个月后。这段婚姻很成功。

莉莉在电影中成熟优雅,落落大方,令人垂涎,但在离开好莱坞后,她失去了成为顶级明星的潜力。她在其余的职业生涯中制作了国际作品,主要是德语和法语,但是她们没有辜负她早期的成功,而且在欧洲之外并没有那么多。然而,她设法工作,与当时的欧洲男明星的“谁是谁”相对,包括CurdJürgens,James Mason,Louis Jourdan,Jean Gabin,Jean Marais,Jean Sorel,GérardPhilipe和Klaus Kinski。在她在好莱坞制作的几部电影中,她扮演了克拉克盖博的多刺妻子,她与年轻的卡罗尔贝克在“不为我”(1959年)中与年轻的卡罗尔贝克有过一段绯闻。在他的公司的快乐(1961年)的合奏演员阵容中,他是一个闪闪发光和诙谐的杰出人物;并证明在威廉霍尔顿间谍惊悚片“假冒叛徒”(1962年)中非常感动。在这里的电视节目中,她作为弗兰克夫人与马克斯·冯·西多(Max von Sydow)合作制作“安妮·弗兰克日记”(1967年),并在着名的迷你剧“彼得大帝”(1986年)中担任其最后一个角色。

最后的十五年中,他们常常在诸如“俄狄浦斯王”(1968年),“德萨德”(1969年)和“巴西男孩”(1978年)等多种电影中扮演配角。她在1975年用她最畅销的畅销书“改变龙虾和舞蹈”展示了她的写作天赋,后来于1978年出版了一本小说“红色乌鸦”(The Red Raven)。1986年在洛杉矶71岁时死于癌症,莉莉的幸存第二任丈夫汤普森,转向电视剧写作/制作,四年后在他的家乡阿根廷自杀。



======

杨安泽会成为美国版的李光耀吗?

看美国网友的评论:

‘Humanity First’ that’s a damn good slogan. I normally don’t even like slogans as a concept, but the very fact that this needs to be said, is an important message. At first, I just thought Yang was an interesting candidate, and I was curious to see how he could change the dialogue, but At this point, I’m convinced. Yang 2020

Yang needs 50k more unique donations by may 25th 2019 to qualify for democrats debate. Please donate if you can, 1 dollar or more is very much appreciated and can make a difference, and please help spreading the words.

Andrew Yang is a once in a generation leader.

He could be our generation of FDR.

Americans are lucky to have candidate like Andrew Yang. He understands where technology going and he is concern for future of everyone because automation will effect all. If people won't pass laws to protect citizens rights corporate tech giants will have all.

I’m liking Yang more and more. I’d like him to address some constructive criticism from Secular Talk. Some laws are good so why does Yang believe that we have to have a sunset rule with laws? That’s kind of scary! Monitoring what is said in the media seems to be stepping on first amendment territory. Please address these criticisms Mr. Yang. Love your interview on JRE Edit: I just visited the website. Perhaps his sunset policy isn’t too bad. But I’m not huge with NEWS AND INFORMATION OMBUDSMAN You have sat with David Pakman, Joe Rogan and Cenk. Go with Kyle Kulinski. I’d love for you to address his gentle criticisms toward you. Lastly, perhaps it’s ignorance on my part but nuclear plants scare me! Yang is pro nuclear?!?!

Saw you on JRE Podcast, everything you said resonated with me, you have no idea, I've been thinking and feeling the same way about America for a long long time now. Just donated $20, don't let me down! Even if you don't get elected please keep fighting like Bernie continues to this day, we need change before the point of no return. I honestly feel that your policies are far superior than Bernie at this point or any politician, keep it up, you're my candidate now! Humanity First! Yang2020!

He's a good guy but he has no experience.

It's fine, he doesn't need to be a politician to be president, being an entrepreneur or even a police officer/army general is good enough

I know he went to law school and worked in the Obama administration which shows that he has political experience but I don't want an inexperienced bum in the White House.

one thing that I am certain of is how fast technology improve and if we let them tech companies will rule the world. Look at ther revenues. Biggest tech componies' revenues are bigger than 90 percent of countries GDPs. We need to protect ourselfs or we will be obsolate. Noone talks about this technology trends and its results except him.

Keep going Mr Yang. You’ve got my vote. I was a Tulsi supporter until I watched you on Rogan. You and her together would be unstoppable.

im a trump fan. But after listening to this guy (not just in this video) he makes alot of pragmatic sense. If he somehow wins the nomination which I doubt. Ill def consider

Andrew Yang is the first person I gave money to who's running for President.

I'll choose you over establishment Biden or kamela any day........Andrew understands the common person........and will prepare us for the future here

Go for it Andy. All is not lost. People need hope a lot more than they realise sometimes. Good luck from the UK! Come over here when you get a chance.

As a southern Republican, business owner, and a finance major. If you make it into the democratic primaries which I hope you do! you seem to have a down to earth vibe and remind me of some of my professors that were very educated men and women. I will change my status to a Democrat, and vote for you. After watching your podcast on Joe Rogan you have my vote. YANG 2020.

Andrew knows what's happening in the country and he has the heart, the intelligence, and the courage to stand up and fight for all Americans and our values. He is the leader we all need right now.

Joe Rogan introduced me too you. You are getting my vote over other Democrats. You are the only one thinking about the real threat to our people as we head to the technological singularity.

Andrew, you need to win, you need to, I'm counting on you

Looking forward to the debates when Andrew outshines the rest.

he is gonna spit so much can't wait

Way too smart to be in politics.

Andrew yang is humanities only hope against an uncertain future. No SJW identity politics. No pandering. Just straight up facts, math and stats

You don’t just get my vote. How do I donate to the campaign? Can I volunteer? Where do I get the merch? Give me 1,000 bumper stickers and I’ll put them all over my city! You need to win. This country is so screwed because we are focusing on past and not future problems.

Trump is doing a great job, u can't compete in 2020.

Can I vote now?



杨安泽竞选政见:


BRIEF

Capitalism as an economic system has led to unparalleled innovation and improvement in the human condition. Many consider it to have “won” the war of ideas against socialism, but that simplistic view ignores that there is no such thing as a pure Capitalist system. And our current version of institutional capitalism and corporatism is a relatively recent development.

Our current emphasis on corporate profits isn’t working for the vast majority of Americans. This will only be made worse by the development of automation technology and AI.

We need to move to a new form of capitalism – Human Capitalism – that’s geared towards maximizing human well-being and fulfillment. The central tenets of Human Capitalism are:

  1. Humans are more important than money
  2. The unit of a Human Capitalism economy is each person, not each dollar
  3. Markets exist to serve our common goals and values

The focus of our economy should be to maximize human welfare. Sometimes this aligns with a purely capitalist approach, where different entities compete for the best ideas. But there are plenty of times when a capitalist system leads to suboptimal outcomes. Think of an airline refusing to honor your ticket because they can get more money from a customer who purchases last-minute, or a pharmaceutical company charging extortionate rates for a life-saving drug because the customers are desperate.

 

 

PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED
  • At present, the Market systematically tends to undervalue many things, activities, and people, many of which are core to the human experience.
Goals
  • Make the economy work for Americans, not the other way around
  • Direct capital to investments to improve human welfare, not to enrich the wealthiest Americans
  • Create measurements around people, not dollars
Guiding Principles
  • Well-being
  • Equality

 

As President, I will…
  • Change the way we measure the economy, from GDP and the stock market to a more inclusive set of measurements that ensures humans are thriving, not barely making it by. New measurements like Median Income and Standard of Living, Health-adjusted Life Expectancy, Mental Health, Childhood Success Rates, Social and Economic Mobility, Absence of Substance Abuse, and other measurements will give us a much clearer and more powerful sense of how we are doing both individually and as a society.  
  • Rein in corporate excesses by appointing regulators who are paid a lot of money – competitive with senior jobs in the private sector – but then will be prohibited from going to private industry afterward.  Regulators need to be focused on making the right decisions and policies for the public with zero concern for their next position.  
  • The government’s goal should be to drive individuals and organizations to find new ways to improve the standards of living of individuals and families on these dimensions.  In order to spur development, the government should issue a new currency – the Digital Social Credit – which can be converted into dollars and used to reward people and organizations who drive significant social value.  This new currency would allow people to measure the amount of good that they have done through various programs and actions.  

 

An Excerpt from The War on Normal People

Imagine an AI life coach with the voice of Oprah or Tom Hanks trying to help parents stay together or raise kids. Or a new Legion of Builders and Demolishers that install millions of solar panels across the country, upgrade our infrastructure and remove derelict buildings while also employing tens of thousands of workers. Or a digital personalized education subs**tion that is constantly giving you new material and grouping you with a few other people who are studying the same thing. Or a wearable device that monitors your vital signs and sends data to your doctor while recommending occasional behavior changes. Or voting securely in your local elections via your smartphone without any worry of fraud.  

Each of these scenarios is possible right now with current technology. But the resources and market incentives for them do not exist. There is limited or no market reward at present for keeping families together or upgrading infrastructure or lifelong education or preventative care or improving democracy. While our smartphones get smarter each season propelled by tens of billions of dollars, our voting machines, bridges, and schools languish in the 1960s.  

This is what we must change.

At present, the Market systematically tends to undervalue many things, activities, and people, many of which are core to the human experience. Consider:  

  • Parenting or caring for loved ones
  • Teaching or nurturing children
  • Arts and creativity
  • Serving the poor
  • Working in struggling regions or environments
  • The Environment
  • Reading
  • Preventative care
  • Character
  • Infrastructure and Public transportation
  • Journalism
  • Women
  • People of color / underrepresented minorities

And now, increasingly,

  • Unskilled Labor and Normal People
  • Meaningful Community Connections
  • Small Independent Businesses
  • Effective Government

There were periods when the Market supported some of these things more than it does today. Today, it needs to be steered to do so. The U.S. has reached a point where its current form of capitalism is faltering in producing an increasing standard of living for the majority of its citizens. It’s time for an upgrade.

 

The Next Stage of Capitalism

Adam Smith, the Scottish Economist who wrote The Wealth of Nations in 1776, is often regarded as the father of modern Capitalism. His ideas of the Invisible Hand that guides the market, division of labor, and that self-interest and competition lead to wealth creation have been so deeply internalized that today we take most of them for granted. Our general thinking today is to contrast ‘Capitalism’ with ‘Socialism,’ which arose in the 1800s and advocated social ownership or democratic control of industries. Karl Marx published Das Kapital in 1867 and argued that capitalism contained internal tensions that would oppress the working class who would eventually rise up and take control. Our perception is that Capitalism – embodied by the West and the United States – won the war of ideas by generating immense growth and wealth and elevating the standard of living of billions of people. Socialism – represented by the Soviet Union which collapsed in 1991 and China which moderated its approach in the 1980s – didn’t work in practice and was thoroughly discredited.

This simplistic assessment misses a couple important points. First, there is no such thing as a pure Capitalist system. There have been many different forms of Western capitalist economies going back centuries ever since money was invented around seven thousand years ago. The market feudalism of the Middle Ages evolved into the expansionist Mercantilism of European trading companies, which evolved into the Industrial Capitalism of 20thcentury America, and into the Welfare Capitalism of the 1960s when the U.S. and many other advanced countries established safety net programs like Social Security and Medicaid. Our current form of institutional capitalism and corporatism is just the latest of many different versions.  

Similarly, there are many forms of capitalism in service around the world right now. Singapore is the 4th richest country in the world in terms of per capita GDP. It has had an unemployment rate of 2.2% or lower since 2009 and is regarded as one of the most free and open, pro-business economies in the world. Yet the government in Singapore regularly shapes investment policy and government-linked firms dominate telecommunications, finance, and media in ways that would be unthinkable in the U.S. Singapore’s system of capitalism is very different than Norway’s and Japan’s and Canada’s and ours. Many countries’ form of capitalism is steered not by an unseen hand, but by clear government policy.

Now imagine a new type of capitalist economy that is geared toward maximizing human well-being and fulfillment. These goals and GDP would sometimes go hand-in-hand. But there would be times when they wouldn’t be aligned. For example, an airline removing passengers who had already boarded a plane to maximize its profitability would be good for capital but bad for people. So would a drug company charging extortionate rates for a life-saving drug. Most Americans would agree that the airline should simply accept the lost revenue and the drug company should accept a moderate profit margin. What if this idea was repeated over and over again throughout the economy?

Call it Human-centered Capitalism, or Human Capitalism for short.

Human Capitalism has a few core tenets:  

  1. Humanity is More Important Than Money
  2. The Unit of an Economy is each Person, not each Dollar
  3. Markets Exist to Serve Our Common Goals and Values

There’s a saying in business that “what gets measured gets managed for.” We need to start measuring different things.  

The concept of GDP and economic progress didn’t even exist until the Great Depression. It was invented so that the government could figure out how bad the economy was getting and how to make it better. Economist Simon Kuznets, upon introducing GDP to Congress in 1934 remarked that “Economic welfare cannot be adequately measured unless the personal distribution of income is known. And no income measurement undertakes to estimate the reverse side of income, that is, the intensity and unpleasantness of effort going into the earning of income. The welfare of a nation can, therefore, scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income as defined above.” It’s almost like he saw income inequality and bad jobs coming.

Our economic system must shift to focus on bettering the lot of the average person. Capitalism has to be made to serve human ends and goals, rather than have our humanity subverted to serve the Marketplace. We shape the system. We own it, not the other way around.

In addition to GDP and job statistics, the government should adopt measurements like:

  • Median Income and Standard of Living
  • Levels of engagement with Work and Labor Participation Rate
  • Health-adjusted life expectancy
  • Childhood Success Rates
  • Infant mortality
  • Surveys of National Well-being
  • Average Physical Fitness and Mental Health
  • Quality of Infrastructure
  • Proportion of Elderly in Quality Care
  • Human Capital Development and Access to Education
  • Marriage Rates and Success
  • Deaths of Despair / Despair Index / Substance Abuse
  • National Optimism / Mindset of Abundance
  • Community Integrity and Social Capital
  • Environmental Quality
  • Global Temperature Variance and Sea Levels
  • Re-acclimation of Incarcerated Individuals and Rates of Criminality
  • Artistic and Cultural Vibrancy
  • Design and Aesthetics
  • Information Integrity / Journalism
  • Dynamism and Mobility
  • Social and Economic Equity
  • Public Safety
  • Civic Engagement
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economic Competitiveness and Growth
  • Responsiveness and Evolution of Government
  • Efficient Use of Resources

It would be straightforward to establish measurements for each of these and have them updated periodically, similar to what Steve Ballmer set up at USAFacts.org. Everyone could then see how we’re doing and be galvanized around improvement.

Human Capitalism will reshape the way that we measure value and progress, and help us redefine why we do what we do. It’s time to build an economy that makes people’s lives better. The market must serve us, not the other way around. 

https://www.yang2020.com/


================


看不懂?不爱看?不奇怪,没关系,看看九零后权威影评女神介绍一部泡菜国妓女竞选总统玩骚黄瓜的精彩故事。

真个电影就一句话:政客的良心还不如妓女!
政客重來沒有良心
如果在中国说,政协委员的良心不如妓女,保证下场很悲惨,
韩国的官僚作风和政府不作为相当烂,就算是现在,确实是大部分政客不如妓女。
别拿中国跟韩国比,韩国的政府和官员水平比中国低太多了。
说的对,韩国政府玩个妓女都是丑闻,中国政府玩幼女都是小意思,根本就不是一个档次
同一年一边沉船总统下台,另一边开庆功会

有几个职业我非常尊重的,妓女,AV女优/A片明星,认真的清洁工。看不起的他们的人,我都没什么话与他们说

咱们不叫公民,咱们是韭菜
看个电影 你都不消停啊?累不累
说的真好,人家是公民,我们是猪狗
是啊,人家再傻*也是公民,我们连牛粪都不如。

腦洞太大了,其中解說諷刺某人某政客真不敢相信出自分分妹。

分分妹总是把严肃的问题隐藏在风骚的解说中












高兴

感动

同情

搞笑

难过

拍砖

支持

鲜花

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2025 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新:GMT+8, 2025-3-9 20:58

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心,为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部