对世界进行规划 Plan the world

作者:转折点  于 2020-10-9 09:12 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

作者分类:全球化|通用分类:热点杂谈

Oct 26, 2015 at 11:15 PM

 

对世界进行规划 Plan the world

 

很多时候我也觉得我自己是纸上谈兵,因为这个世界这么大,我不是什么都知道的. 上次提到一个社会的结构,不管意识形态如何,文明程度如何,有一些基础建设是必须的,这也是工程的目标. 能源,交通,食物,水,下水,住房,衣物,教育,医疗,法律,市场,等是必须配备的. 对于一无所有的地区和贫穷落后的地区,是不是有可能以一步到位的方式让他们享受最先进的技术? 用什么来回报呢?用当地的产出. 先进地区和国家,土地上产生的价值胜过土地上投入的价值. 但不是所有地方都这样. 中国在过去二十多年,尽量地发掘当地的土地价值,尤其是农产品和手工产品,使土地产出更高的价值. 同时发展当地的文化,让文化的植入使产品有更高的价值. 亚洲中西部是有很久历史的地区,文化深厚. 像波斯地毯,金银器,香料,油枣. 美妙的音乐,珍贵的马匹,虽然有多年的战乱,但是文化是不会消失的, 那是非常精致的文化. 

 Many times I also feel that I am making designs on paper, because the world is so big, I don't know everything. Last time I mentioned about the structure of a society, regardless of ideology, civilization level, there are some infrastructures that are necessary, and this is also the goal of engineering. Energy, transportation, food, water, sewage, housing, clothing, education, medical care, law, market, etc. must be equipped. Is it possible to let them enjoy the most advanced technology in a one-step way for a poor and backward region? What is the return? From local output. Advanced regions and countries, the value generated on land is better than the value invested in land. But not all places. China has been trying to discover the value of local land, especially agricultural products, hand-made products, over the past two decades so that the land yields higher value. At the same time, the development of local culture, the implantation of culture makes the product more valuable. The central and western part of Asia is a region with a long history and profound culture. Like Persian carpet, gold silverware, spices, dateswonderful music, precious horses, although there are years of war, but culture will not disappear, it is a very refined culture.

中南美也有许多特别的文化,很特别的地质景观,世界上最上等的牛肉,羊驼, 羊驼毛制品,茶,特别的音乐,动物,水果,特别好吃的奶昔. 这些地方工业落后,但是没有污染. 美国每个城市把土地分成不同的区,住宅区和商业区工业区是分开的,工业区不能住人,住宅区不能开商业. 是不是把全球也分成不同的功能区?中国是属于制造业的污染严重区?美国和其他非重工业国家是居住区?亚热带是属于畜牧业区? 靠近热带属于农业区?现在只是全球化的初级阶段. 设计交通线路是不是应考虑地质情况,还要考虑怎么把当地的产出沿路连起来,方便运送到全球的市场. 尽量沿路发展城市,配备适合的能源,用先进的材料快速便捷制造现代房屋,配备生活需要. 

 

Central and South America also has many special cultures, very special geological landscapes, the world's finest beef, alpaca, alpaca products, tea, special music, animals, fruits, especially delicious milk shake. These local industries are backward but there is no pollution. Every city in the United States divides the land into different zones. The industrial zonesresidential and commercial zones are separate. In industrial zone people cannot live there. In residential zone there is no industry. Is the world divided into different functional zones? Is China a heavily polluted area of ??manufacturing? Are US and other non-heavy industry countries a residential area? Is the subtropical zone an animal husbandry area? Is it agriculture close to the tropics? Now it is only the initial stage of Globalization. Is that to design the transportation route should consider the geological conditions, consider how to connect the local output along the road to facilitate transportation to the global marketTry to develop the city along the road, equip with suitable energy, and quickly and easily manufacture modern houses with advanced materials.

 

我记得在耶路撒冷的市场上,无论是犹太区,伊斯兰区,有很多的宗教用品,大多数产品是中国制造的. 是不是应该有一个计划,如果可以把某些东西集中在一起生产的话,就不要从一个国家移到另一个国家,好像是降低成本,但实际上是逐渐的把这个地球给糟蹋了. 人口密度太高,虽然土地产生的价值很大,但是代价是生活质量,环境污染,孩子成长缺少健康空间得不偿失. 对劳动密集型的,是不是应该提高自动化程度. 大量产品生产,有很多是浪费的,消耗很多资源. 可不可以更具体的分析需求量,个体化量产. 你有大数据在手,充分利用它. 是不是应该规定土地的人口密度上限,有效控制土地的价值过份上升,把产业分布开,工作机会分布开,对交通的压力就不会太大,地区差别也不会太大. 不然人往高处走,越来越集中. 像香港东京那样的都市,让人头疼影响孩子的视野心胸,身体发育. 或者让年轻人在这边工作, 一段时间以后疏散出去,再换一批人. 尽量污染降到最低.

I remember that in the market in Jerusalem, there are many religious items in the Jewish and Islamic areas. Most of the products are made in China. Is there a plan, if some things can be put together for productiondon't move from one country to another, it seems to reduce costs, but it is actually ruining the earth. The population density is too high, although the value of land is great, but the price is quality of life, environmental pollution, children's growth lacks a healthy space, and it is not worth the loss. For labor-intensive, it is necessary to improve the degree of automation. A large number of products are produced, many are wasted, consume a lot of resources. Can you analyze the demand more specifically, individualized mass production. You have big data in hand, make full use of it. Is it necessary to stipulate the upper limit of the population density of the land, effectively control the value of the land to rise excessively, spread the industry, distribute the work opportunities, and less pressure on trafficless difference between regions. Otherwise, people will go higher concentrated area more and more. Like Tokyo, Hong Kong, make me headache, limit child's vision and mind, physical development. Or let young people work heretemporarily, evacuate out later, and replace by a new group of people. As far as possible put pollution to a minimum.


高兴

感动

同情

搞笑

难过

拍砖

支持

鲜花

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新:GMT+8, 2024-5-3 20:27

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心,为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部