下载APP | 繁體版 | 发布广告 |常用工具

赵大夫话室 (已有 2,501,678 人访问过博主空间)

https://www.backchina.com/u/382538

七七事变：身为导火索的失踪日本士兵结局为何？

作者：赵大夫话室  于 2023-7-10 20:23 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

作者分类:历史事件|通用分类:文史杂谈|已有5评论

关键词：七七事变, 失踪日本士兵

七七事变爆发已经八十六年了，这是中国人铭心刻骨的日子，难以忘怀。


七七事变标志着中国全面抗战的开始，但仍有不少未解之谜。

1.七七事变究竟是日本军方的擅自行动还是日本政府蓄谋已久的事件？

无数的历史证据表明他是日本政府、财阀、政党、军队的共同意志，绝对不是什么少数军人的擅自行动？

早在1927年，当时的日本首相田中义一就组成了所谓的田中内阁，内阁在1927年召开东方会议，这场会议几乎聚集了来自日本的高层，其中就包括日本驻华公使、日本外相、内阁长官等。

这场会议主要就是探讨如何侵略和奴役中国，甚至把侵华战争当做日本的国策。

与此同时位于东北的南满铁道株式会社也主张向华北进军，目的就是为了略夺东北以外地区更加丰富的资源。满铁先后两次派遣考察团到华北进行考察，明确指出了夺取山西煤炭和控制华北铁路干线的重要性。

1935年察哈尔事件开始，国民政府步步撤退，放弃了河北、察哈尔地区的主权，甚至在华北地区成立了所谓察冀政务委员会，其政府的主权处于半独立的状态。

从政府、财阀，然后再到军队，日本政府发动这场政变原本就是蓄谋已久。侵占东北之后，全日本上下都在谋求如何扩大在华的殖民地，这不得不说根本不是日本军方单方面的决定。

2.那么士兵真的失踪了吗？结果又如何？

1937年7月7日，日本鬼子炮轰宛平城给出的理由是士兵失踪了，军中甚至流传这名日本士兵被中国军人给杀害了。其实那名士兵确实暂时消失了，不过在日军打算炮轰宛平城之前，这名士兵就已经归队了。

1938年，日本著名的《朝日新闻》在采访华北驻军丰台队队长一木青直时披露了真相，他在采访当中承认了这名士兵在发动战争之前就已经归队了，他的想法是如何以这个东西为借口攻击对面的中国军队，如果不拿出这个借口的话，日本有可能错失发动战争的机会。

为了防止事件败露，日本军方强令要求这么士兵退伍回到日本，太平洋战争爆发后，日本宣称是因为“生理需要”，把这名士兵调往缅甸战场，这位士兵于1944年死于中国远征军孙立人的部队之下，也算是罪有应得。

中日两国是宿敌不假，时至今日，中国仍是日本恶行的坚决抵抗者。日本坚持向海洋排放他们自称安全的核废水，据说连联合国相关组织也认可，就连韩国这样一贯对日强硬的国家，最近好像脊梁也不那么直了，这一点中国政府所作所为应该给与点赞。

日本政府对过去的罪恶不道歉、不悔过，而且频频亮出新的动作，中日关系无解！

 


高兴
感动
同情
搞笑
难过
拍砖
支持
鲜花
收藏 分享邀请 举报

发表评论 评论 (5 个评论)

4 回复 屠龙刀之原界 2023-7-11 01:12
日本就没有败给中国，为啥要要向中国道歉？看看日本对美国毕恭毕敬，世人为畏威不畏德，日本人尤甚。
1 回复 浮平 2023-7-11 09:00
Japan–China Joint Communiqué

Final agreement

Kakuei Tanaka, former Prime Minister of Japan

From September 25 to September 30, 1972, Japanese Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka visited the PRC at the invitation of Premier of the People's Republic of China Zhou Enlai. Accompanying PM Tanaka were Minister for Foreign Affairs Masayoshi Ōhira, Chief Cabinet Secretary Susumu Nikaido, and other government officials. Chinese Communist Party chairman Mao Zedong met Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka on September 27.

PM Tanaka and FM Ōhira had an earnest and frank exchange of views with Premier Zhou Enlai and Chinese Minister for Foreign Affairs Ji Pengfei on the question of normalizing relations between Japan and China, as well as other problems and matters of interest between the two countries. In the end, they agreed to issue the following Joint Communique:

Japan and China are neighboring countries, separated only by a strip of water with a long history of traditional friendship. The people of the two countries earnestly desire to put an end to the abnormal state of affairs that has hitherto existed between the two countries. The realization of the aspiration of the two peoples for the termination of the state of war and the normalization of relations between Japan and China will add a new page to the annals of relations between the two countries.

The Japanese side is keenly conscious of the responsibility for the serious damage that Japan caused in the past to the Chinese people through war, and deeply reproaches itself. Further, the Japanese side reaffirms its position that it intends to realize the normalization of relations between the two countries from the stand of fully understanding 'the three principles for the restoration of relations'; put forward by the Government of the People's Republic of China. The Chinese side expresses its welcome for this.

In spite of the differences in their social systems existing between the two countries, the two countries should, and can, establish relations of peace and friendship. The normalization of relations and development of good-neighborly and friendly relations between the two countries are in the interests of the two peoples and will contribute to the relaxation of tension in Asia and peace in the world.

The abnormal state of affairs that has hitherto existed between Japan and the People's Republic of China is terminated on the date on which this Joint Communique is issued.
The Government of Japan recognizes that Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China.

The Government of the People's Republic of China reiterates that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People's Republic of China. The Government of Japan fully understands and respects this stance of the Government of the People's Republic of China, and it firmly maintains its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation.

The Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China have decided to establish diplomatic relations as from September 29, 1972. The two Governments have decided to take all necessary measures for the establishment and the performance of the functions of each other's embassy in their respective capitals in accordance with international law and practice, and to exchange ambassadors as speedily as possible.

The Government of the People's Republic of China declares that, in the interest of the friendship between the Chinese and the Japanese peoples, it renounces its demand for war reparations from Japan.

The Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China agree to establish relations of perpetual peace and friendship between the two countries on the basis of the principles of mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, non-interference in each other's internal affairs, equality and mutual benefit and peaceful co-existence. The two Governments confirm that, in conformity with the foregoing principles and the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, Japan and China shall in their mutual relations settle all disputes by peaceful means and shall refrain from the use or threat of force.

The normalization of relations between Japan and China is not directed against any third country. Neither of the two countries should seek hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region and each is opposed to efforts by any other country or group of countries to establish such hegemony.

The Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China have agreed that, with a view to solidifying and developing the relations of peace and friendship between the two countries, the two Governments will enter into negotiations for the purpose of concluding a treaty of peace and friendship.

The Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China have agreed that, with a view to further promoting relations between the two countries and to expanding interchanges of people, the two Governments will, as necessary and taking account of the existing non-governmental arrangements, enter into negotiations for the purpose of concluding agreements concerning such matters as trade, shipping, aviation, and fisheries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan%E2%80%93China_Joint_Communiqu%C3%A9
2 回复 七把叉Archie 2023-7-11 17:18
浮平博辛苦，为大伙搬来了中日联合声明。中国明文声明，不要求日本做战争赔偿。尽管如此，日本为中国发展投入无偿贷款，低息贷款，先进技术，管理理念，为中国八九十年代经济腾飞，起到重要作用。中日共同确认，对于双方的任何分歧，本着联合国宪章，共同发展及双方友谊原则，通过和平谈判方式解决纠纷，绝不诉诸武力或者威胁使用武力。1972年签约，度过三十年的蜜月，中方获得过巨大利益。如今天天核平日本，剑拔弩张。呵呵，想起习总对于加拿大的土豆评语，太天真。我也觉得，日本人以为深刻反省，用实际行动无偿无息的经济援助，就能够化解所欠下的战争罪行，中国人民就会真心原谅他们的过错。呵呵，太傻太天真了。
1 回复 屠龙刀之原界 2023-7-12 03:02
你这个冒充大陆人的粪叉子，瞎BB个茄子！当年蒋介石不要战争赔款，是美国逼得，当然也没脸要，毕竟日本不是中国打败的。中共接盘，因由蒋放弃在先，中共也没法张口。何况为了引诱日本放弃蒋介石，也不得不为。

至于当年日本对中国的无息，低息贷款，其实日本也没吃亏，借此独占中国市场, 日本家电，汽车称霸30年！

再说了当年的日本政客还是有理想的政客，为了摆脱脖子上的铁索，处心积虑的为美国培养对手，从暗助苏联高精设备（比如车床），扶植中国的发展，都是一脉相承。日本唯一摆脱美国控制的机会就是，美国被打败，这样日本才会从美国的奴役中解脱。

经过半个世界的尝试，苏联死狗扶不到墙上，美国一家独大，日本政客渐渐的失去了最后一丝念想。老老实实的当奴才吧！在可见的未来脱链的希望几近渺茫! 于是就出现了安倍这类政客！拼命的替主人着想，拼命的为主人汪汪，以图主人給块肉多的骨头！
2 回复 七把叉Archie 2023-7-12 05:51
屠龙刀之原界: 你这个冒充大陆人的粪叉子，瞎BB个茄子！当年蒋介石不要战争赔款，是美国逼得，当然也没脸要，毕竟日本不是中国打败的。中共接盘，因由蒋放弃在先，中共也没法张
你以为我像你妈的大松比一样，没事就噗呲噗呲到处撒气？你个煞笔文盲拿无知当有趣，每每看见揭露中共无耻谰言的时候，你就像条疯狗本能维护主子，上蹿下跳，拿出脱肛的力气，拼命吹喇叭抬轿子。英国还是法国独立打败德国了？还是波兰捷克希腊阿尔巴尼亚？被纳粹杀的血流成河的犹太人，已经亡国两千年了，这些国家无一例外都获得德国的战争赔偿。蒋介石不要战争赔偿的文件呢？退一万步，就算蒋签字画押不要赔偿，蒋介石是中共他爹？他干过的事情，中共必须萧规曹随？你个狗入的职业五毛狗，死心塌地肝脑涂地的为主子呕心沥血。杨小凯教授的父亲是副省级干部，任大炮他爹也是司局级，还有魏京生也是。罗瑞卿是总参谋长，副国级领导，儿子罗宇罗点点都深刻认识到那个体制的腐朽没落。你爷爷是个大队书记，一个股长级干部。在京官云集，司局长夹个黑包挤公车的文革年代，股长在北京连个科员都算不上，只能是编外人员，但这丝毫不影响你们一家全心全意为主人服务，你一家子脑残，几代人脑残，而且是显性遗传，代代症状明显，难以根治。

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

赵大夫话室最受欢迎的博文
  1. 赵少康是统派、独派、骑墙派？ [2021/02]
  2. 商人郭文贵和国脚郝海东的“新中国联邦”何在？ [2021/07]
  3. 2024年的台湾，谁主沉浮？ [2021/02]
  4. 比港台更亲近大陆 - 可爱的缅甸果敢、佤邦同胞 [2021/03]
  5. 如何评价刘志军？贪官、罪犯乎？高铁功臣乎？ [2021/04]
  6. 耶鲁毕业的村官 – 秦玥飞，当朝驸马？ [2023/06]
  7. 两岸关系剑拔弩张、一触即发，为何大多数台湾人临危不惧？ [2021/03]
  8. 台湾统派的现状和未来 [2021/04]
  9. 军人当政的虎狼之国，缅甸华人割据政权 – 佤邦缘何30年屹立不倒？ [2021/03]
  10. 眼中的文革，观“毛主席接见红卫兵”有感 [2021/05]
  11. 秦刚身世考：与博古、李维汉、董存瑞的关系 [2023/07]
  12. 失而复得的团聚，一家四口打牌记 [2021/03]
  13. 又一个“红场事件”，我看福建男子驾驶橡皮艇“叛逃”台湾案 [2021/05]
  14. 文革“炮打司令部”事件再现台湾， “中国人的政党”- 新党前景堪忧 [2021/04]
  15. 从昨日美前高官访台，看蔡英文在国家统一大业中的实质作用 [2021/04]
  16. 俄乌战争与抗日战争本质上的不同 [2022/04]
  17. “新疆种族灭绝” 与中国的人口问题 [2021/02]
  18. 泽连斯基是否是乌克兰的民族英雄？ [2022/03]
  19. 乌克兰问题上，普京最大的失误是什么？ [2022/09]
  20. 俄乌战争，国人挺俄人数众多的原因 [2022/05]
  21. 崽卖爷田不心疼：台积电在美设厂之我见 [2022/12]
  22. 北溪被炸，美俄英波乌谁是凶手？ [2022/10]
  23. 解放军攻台惨败，美智库的兵推是否靠普？ [2023/01]
  24. 台湾人的矛盾心态：老子要台独与祖国万岁！ [2022/08]
  25. 目前中美交恶，谁的责任更大？ [2023/04]
  26. 大陆攻台，躲在故宫和台积电是否安全？ [2023/03]
  27. 俄乌战争，中西方立场为何大相径庭？ [2023/04]
  28. 天安门事件：四五与六四的不同结局 [2023/06]
  29. 由宝马冰激凌谈起：二鬼子为什么更遭人恨？ [2023/05]
  30. 华裔庄文浩的反华急先锋之路能走多远？ [2023/05]
其它[文史杂谈]博文更多

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户：倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新：GMT+8, 2023-8-8 10:08

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心，为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部