The implementation ban on Xinjiang goods may be the first domino to fall

作者:羽西谈郭  于 2022-6-20 19:22 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

作者分类:杂谈|通用分类:热点杂谈|已有1评论

关键词:新疆, 人权, 美国, humanrights, xinjiang

According to the sources of foreign media, U.S. authorities are expected to make the "Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA)" effective on June 21 and will impose import bans on commodities from the Xinjiang region, China in accordance with this act.

In December 2021, U.S. President Biden signed the UFLPA to prevent Xinjiang commodities from flowing into the U.S. market. The "UFLPA" includes a system with a core concept of "rebuttable presumption", which means that unless it is certified by the U.S. authorities as free from forced labor, it will be presumed that all products manufactured in Xinjiang use forced labor and are prohibited to be imported. The "UFLPA" clearly states that the clause of "rebuttable presumption" will come into effect on June 21, 180 days after the promulgation of the act.

From the content of the act, the Xinjiang-related act first presumes all products mined, produced, and manufactured in Xinjiang to be suspected of "forced labor", and no longer distinguish product categories, unless the producer and exporter can prove their "innocence". As for how to prove that there is no "forced labor" for their products, according to the information available, the standards are not clear enough, and the proof materials are not clear enough, which gives the customs and relevant law enforcement agencies a lot of discretion, and makes it difficult to control the risk boundary and follow the standards. U.S. retailer Dillard Company said that the U.S. government's "Withhold and Release Order" will affect the global supply chain, including the company's cotton-containing products. The legislation that completely blocks commodity imports from Xinjiang could lead to higher commodity costs and have an impact on corporate profits.

In general, the "UFLPA" is very lethal and must not be treated lightly. Besides, the promulgation of this act represents the beginning of a sharp rightward turn in the policies of the two parties and the establishment in the U.S. towards China. The "UFLPA" is only the beginning, which may be the first falling domino. If we let the situation continue, in the next step, U.S. authorities may apply the precedent of the "UFLPA" to fields related to Tibet, Hong Kong, and even defense and military enterprises to indiscriminately attack China's industries! The reason is already there for them to use! Human rights are really a good guise. Even the "forced labor" in Xinjiang, which is an act of calling white black, can be used as a reason for the U.S. government to indiscriminately attack Xinjiang's industries. What else can’t the U.S. government do?


高兴

感动

同情

搞笑

难过

拍砖

支持

鲜花

发表评论 评论 (1 个评论)

5 回复 浮平 2022-6-20 21:56
Isn't this the law?

【The United Nations International Labour Organization (ILO) today adopted a new legally binding protocol on forced labour, aiming to advance prevention, protection and compensation measures, as well as to intensify efforts to eliminate contemporary forms of slavery.】in 2014

https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/06/470542-un-agency-adopts-treaty-advancing-global-efforts-tackle-forced-labour

Laws are clear and should be followed even though they were not enforced all the time. If not and being caught, to some extend, the benefit of the doubt may not be applied。There will be the consequence.

This time, the consequence would be the inconvenience?

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

羽西谈郭最受欢迎的博文
  1. 《客观评价习近平》一文:令人失望的左右“缝合怪” [2022/03]
  2. 《客观评价习近平》悄然撤稿,闹剧终散场 [2022/03]
  3. 起底 《客观评价习近平》的作者“方舟与中国” [2022/04]
  4. 《客观评价习近平》:小布尔乔亚的无病呻吟 [2022/03]
  5. 《客观评价习近平》之我见 [2022/03]
  6. “陌生又熟悉”的美国记者樊嘉扬 [2023/02]
  7. 美国之音陈小平:反转角色的荒诞传媒之旅 [2023/07]
  8. 邱家军疑被控制 真相让人细思极恐【转载】 [2022/10]
  9. 如何看待樊嘉扬这类“崇洋媚外者”的“跪族”现象? [2022/10]
  10. “一代半”移民的樊嘉扬到底是不是一枚棋子? [2022/07]
  11. 樊嘉扬:不必把歪曲中国当消遣! [2022/05]
  12. 樊嘉扬:一个精致的利己主义者! [2022/04]
  13. 樊嘉扬们之终焉 [2022/04]
  14. 浅析纽约客华裔记者樊嘉扬的“夹生饭”处境 [2022/07]
  15. 中国上海的疫情,让我们见识真正的“阴谋论” [2022/06]
  16. The implementation ban on Xinjiang goods may be the first domino to fall [2022/06]
  17. 揭江天勇、李和平等人“维权律师” 之假面纱 [2022/10]
  18. The objective evaluation of《New Yorker》 reporter Jiayang Fan [2022/07]
  19. 我眼中的樊嘉扬和美国社会 [2022/06]
  20. 大规模监控,飙升的监控资金,令人窒息的监控网络...... [2022/10]
  21. 樊嘉扬:扭曲心态下的“是非”者 [2022/07]
  22. 跳梁小丑何其多 却成西方香饽饽 ——聊聊网络红人“樊嘉扬、许秀中”等人 [2022/11]
  23. 浅谈对美国与“北溪”事件的几点思考 [2023/02]
  24. 十年过去,美国的苹果和谷歌依旧在跟踪用户ID! [2022/10]

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2025 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新:GMT+8, 2025-5-3 15:39

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心,为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部