- 真正的出生证是什么样的? [2012/07]
- 赵皓阳:失传的屠龙术:勇士变成了恶龙怎么办? [2018/09]
- 又一个“吴京华” [2008/12]
- [网文摘录]李志绥的神秘之死——为何被中情局谋杀? [2018/02]
- 转贴:年薪50万美元在纽约的悲惨生活 [2009/02]
- [网摘] "唐朝明光铠"...模型 [2010/04]
- 我所喜欢的女人 [2007/04]
- [网摘] 站桩 - 四平大马步桩 [2010/08]
- [网摘]西洋名画,霍尔班《法国大使》 [2012/04]
- 网摘:【陈光标:对慈善捐赠的认识】 [2009/04]
- 那些鲜为人知不应忘却的抗战细节 (萨苏) [2014/12]
- 亦舒文摘 - 五十句话 - 转贴 [2009/04]
- 转贴:郭德纲的一定场诗 [2008/12]
- 鲁迅:论辩的魂灵 [2018/03]
- 阿根廷输了,我的世界杯结束了 [2010/07]
- 网摘:俗话说的好,好?! [2009/08]
- 网摘:如果你的女人猫性消失了,说明她要离开你了 [2009/06]
- 何以共产党竟容许如此是非颠倒的电影上映? [2009/09]
- 网摘:一个解放军副团职军官09年4月涨工资后的工资单 [2009/05]
- 我干了,你随意 [2009/12]
- 俺媳妇的梦想...之一 [2009/11]
- 人民英雄永垂不朽!! [2009/09]
- 生气有啥用? [2009/08]
- 网摘:老婆 - 未知作者 [2009/12]
- 对于劝离用户的不同意见 [2009/03]
- 谁知道这是什么意思? [2009/01]
- 为什么很多人没有人味? [2009/08]
... The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. These subtilised interpretations are highly manifold according to their nature and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything ‘chosen’ about them.
In general I find it painful that you claim a privileged position and try to defend it by two walls of pride, an external one as a man and an internal one as a Jew. As a man you claim, so to speak, a dispensation from causality otherwise accepted, as a Jew the privilege of monotheism. But a limited causality is no longer a causality at all, as our wonderful Spinoza recognized with all incision, probably as the first one. And the animistic interpretations of the religions of nature are in principle not annulled by monopolisation. With such walls we can only attain a certain self-deception, but our moral efforts are not furthered by them. On the contrary.
Now that I have quite openly stated our differences in intellectual convictions it is still clear to me that we are quite close to each other in essential things, i.e. in our evalutations [sic]of human behaviour. What separates us are only intellectual ‘props’ and ‘rationalisation’ in Freud’s language. Therefore I think that we would understand each other quite well if we talked about concrete things.
With friendly thanks and best wishes
Yours, A. Einstein.