这里是网友评论第2页，点击查看原文
发表评论 评论 (36 个评论)
- 1 回复 light12
- A lot of people thought 80-20 stepped into the college admission battle
oneweek: 小二多说几句。 说的太少不好理解
for the self-interest of Asian Americans.
YES! 80-20 always thought having the ability and courage to protect
self-interest is important. Otherwise, we don't deserve to be a part of
America - "land of the free and the home of the BRAVE." Our community
has been very weak in speaking up for ourselves.
NO! We didn't do it purely for the narrow self-interest of Asian Ams.
We did it for enlightened self-interest, taking into account the interests of
the rest of our nation.
It is RIGHT for us to speak up!
Step by step, 80-20 found out that a race-conscious college admission
policy not only discriminates against Asian Am applicants but also doesn't
help other minority students, owing to "academic mismatch."
However, the discrimination against us is outrageously severe. In the 1st
of the 3-article series, we already reported Prof. Espenshade's finding:
" To receive equal 
consideration by elite colleges, Asian
Americans must outperform Whites 
by 140 points, Hispanics
by 280 points, Blacks by 450 points in SAT (Total 
1600)."
Today, we'll show you a less known but an additional solid proof of
discrimination.
About a century ago, our "best" universities used to discriminate
against Jewish students using such fuzzy concepts as "character" and "fit".
We are elated that such discrimination against the Jewish students has
ebbed. Today, with a population that is only half the size of Asian
Americans, the average % of Jewish students in "first-tier" universities is
HIGHER than that of Asian American students. To verify, please click on
a report entitled "Jewish student populations at various colleges".
http://www.inlikeme.com/jewish-student-populations-various-colleges-universities.html .
So why is the higher bar seemingly applied to Asian Americans ONLY?
It's because we are easy to discriminate against! UNITE, fellow Asian
Americans, so that we are not so easy to be discriminated against.
How are our opponents to defend against the finding that the burden
of diversity has been borne mostly by Asian Ams applicants? They haul
out the "holistic" approach which is just as fuzzy a concept as "character"
and "fit" and as destined to be rejected by history.
What History Taught US!
When suffrage movement (women's right to 5c68 vote) was first started,
many women were against it. Today 2% of Asian Americans still
support a "race-conscious" college admission policy and the so-called
"holistic" approach in admission. 4 Asian American organizations,
purporting to speak for our community, filed amicus briefs to support the
"race-conscious" policy with the Supreme Court.
Look into history and UNITE, fellow Asian Americans. Winning equal
opportunity for ourselves is good for ourselves and America -- it helps
make America "A MORE PERFECT UNION."
Post your comments by clicking on 

http://www.80-20educationalfoundation.org/politicaledu/posterboard.asp .
Sincerely,
S. B. Woo
President, 80-20 National Asian Am. Educational Foundation
PS: See if your own name is on the list. Click on http://www.80-20EF.org .
Move your cursor to "Projects" on the menu bar. 3 lines will drop down.
Move your cursor down to "Win Equal Opportunity in Colleges" and click.
Go to a list of the 50,000 survey-takers sorted in last and first names.
If you name is there, be proud that you've joined a historic
battle.
- 3 回复 布衣人
- 实验室有一个 Intern Position给高中生，明确写出对少数族裔优先考虑。來了同班的一中一黑，相比之下老中的女孩优秀太多了，成绩全A，校外社会活动很积极，得奖多次。结果选老黑了。家长领着孩子来了，人事部门回答如雷灌耳，这少数族裔条件对你们不适用。看着女孩茫然又纯真的表情，看了难受。她稚嫩的心灵得到是什么价值观的体验？
- 2 回复 light12
- 老中不是少数族裔
布衣人: 实验室有一个 Intern Position给高中生，明确写出对少数族裔优先考虑。來了同班的一中一黑，相比之下老中的女孩优秀太多了，成绩全A，校外社会活动很积极，得奖 ...
美国人太不像话
12