-
已有(60)人发表了评论
- 回复 举报 [ 21楼 游客 (99.184.x.x) ] 发表于
- 回九楼 不知为什么两次写的都没登上，只好再写了。 中越战争越南不是没有正规军参战，越方其中投入的正规军里，其中有二个师是曾经在越法、越美战争中立过大功的。其实众所周知、越南的民兵不比正规军差，这在美越战争中是不争的事实！更重要的是做为一个刚刚从美越战争中走出来的国家，积累的战争经验及实际作战人员，都比中国军人强的多，中国军人恐怕最多的是师一级的军官打过仗，而战争支撑点是士兵！更何况中国军队是从最不好打仗的山区向平原推进。中国真的耍想帮助柬埔寨，会有更多的其它选择，中越之战更多的意义是教训越南别太狂妄了！ 另外请您最好用中文写，不是看不懂您那中式英文，毕竟这里是中文网页。谢谢！
- 回复 举报 [ 18楼 游客 (99.184.x.x) ] 发表于
- [quote]9楼 游客(204.80.x.x): With a 1:1 casualty rate, yes, China could have taken the whole Vietnam with its much larger population. The question is, what was the goal? Could China have become a permanent occupation force there? I strongly doubt it. However, the Chinese with inexperienced comanders did not achieve its original strategic goal which was to force the only 4 elite devisions of the VC troops from Cambodia to relieve the pressure on the Pol Pot regime. TRhat was a bad and evil idea as the same regime that the Chinese tried to save killed 2 million of its own population. In any case, the VC did not bite the bait. It only used its local troops and militias in battling elite Chinese field armies. For the Chinese, it was a total desaster. For the young lives, they parished for no gains. The VC's reported border skimishes resumed shorly after the war was over and some of the territories that the Chinese fought and grabbed had to be returned to VC. The youngsters died in vain.[/q
- 回复 举报 [ 17楼 游客 (99.184.x.x) ] 发表于
- [quote]9楼 游客(204.80.x.x): With a 1:1 casualty rate, yes, China could have taken the whole Vietnam with its much larger population. The question is, what was the goal? Could China have become a permanent occupation force there? I strongly doubt it. However, the Chinese with inexperienced comanders did not achieve its original strategic goal which was to force the only 4 elite devisions of the VC troops from Cambodia to relieve the pressure on the Pol Pot regime. TRhat was a bad and evil idea as the same regime that the Chinese tried to save killed 2 million of its own population. In any case, the VC did not bite the bait. It only used its local troops and militias in battling elite Chinese field armies. For the Chinese, it was a total desaster. For the young lives, they parished for no gains. The VC's reported border skimishes resumed shorly after the war was over and some of the territories that the Chinese fought and grabbed had to be returned to VC. The youngsters died in vain.[/q
- 回复 举报 [ 16楼 游客 (70.51.x.x) ] 发表于
- Interesting idea, but, it is not true and it is a bad idea. Luckily it didn't go that way. Otherwise, China would stuck in an expensive long term war with Russia and Vietnam at the same time. China also would be fighting 2 wars at 2 fronts . Eventually, China would win but, with a very heavy cost. mak
- 回复 举报 [ 14楼 游客 (24.7.x.x) ] 发表于
- [quote百分之七十中国人都知道朝鲜战争中国死几十万人，只有你井底蛙不知道。我对共产党冇好感，但是没有共产党就没有今日强大的中国。]4楼 游客(184.151.x.x): 放屁[/quote]
- 回复 举报 [ 13楼 游客 (187.210.x.x) ] 发表于
- 啊Q正是说的你自己啊，哈哈。
3楼 游客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自乐，朝鲜战争丢掉60万志愿军的小命，中越战争50万打越南30万，最后还割地求和，把涼山等中国领土献给越南，土共从不把真相告诉国内愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓会立马推翻土共非法政府
- 回复 举报 [ 11楼 游客 (99.184.x.x) ] 发表于
- 如果越南那会儿别没事找事的骚扰中国边民，也就不会递给中国这个机会。
8楼 游客(99.121.x.x): 中国打越南唯一放不上台面的是想支撑灭绝人性的波尔布特政权。
- 回复 举报 [ 10楼 游客 (24.114.x.x) ] 发表于
- 看看以前德国和日本拍的纪录片，对中国军队赞赏有加。一直认为打击了苏联集团。现在逢中就反的家伙就满嘴放屁。要知道那时柬埔寨的西哈努克亲王还是北京的座上客呢。
- 回复 举报 [ 9楼 游客 (204.80.x.x) ] 发表于
- With a 1:1 casualty rate, yes, China could have taken the whole Vietnam with its much larger population. The question is, what was the goal? Could China have become a permanent occupation force there? I strongly doubt it. However, the Chinese with inexperienced comanders did not achieve its original strategic goal which was to force the only 4 elite devisions of the VC troops from Cambodia to relieve the pressure on the Pol Pot regime. TRhat was a bad and evil idea as the same regime that the Chinese tried to save killed 2 million of its own population. In any case, the VC did not bite the bait. It only used its local troops and militias in battling elite Chinese field armies. For the Chinese, it was a total desaster. For the young lives, they parished for no gains. The VC's reported border skimishes resumed shorly after the war was over and some of the territories that the Chinese fought and grabbed had to be returned to VC. The youngsters died in vain.
- 回复 举报 [ 8楼 游客 (99.121.x.x) ] 发表于
- 中国打越南唯一放不上台面的是想支撑灭绝人性的波尔布特政权。
7楼 游客(99.184.x.x): 战争是看结果而不是死亡人数！请别把这两个观念弄混了，中国军人在两周内占据了凉山，不到三周时间就可箭指河内，能把打了几十年仗的越南军队打的溃不成军，战争结果不言而喻！双方损失都很大，也正因如此、战争也应该是最后的选择，因为最终受伤的还是两国老百姓。另外、有理讲理，敬请不要带国骂回复。
- 回复 举报 [ 7楼 游客 (99.184.x.x) ] 发表于
- 战争是看结果而不是死亡人数！请别把这两个观念弄混了，中国军人在两周内占据了凉山，不到三周时间就可箭指河内，能把打了几十年仗的越南军队打的溃不成军，战争结果不言而喻！双方损失都很大，也正因如此、战争也应该是最后的选择，因为最终受伤的还是两国老百姓。另外、有理讲理，敬请不要带国骂回复。
3楼 游客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自乐，朝鲜战争丢掉60万志愿军的小命，中越战争50万打越南30万，最后还割地求和，把涼山等中国领土献给越南，土共从不把真相告诉国内愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓会立马推翻土共非法政府
- 回复 举报 [ 5楼 游客 (96.255.x.x) ] 发表于
- 鸟人，胡说八道甚！
3楼 游客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自乐，朝鲜战争丢掉60万志愿军的小命，中越战争50万打越南30万，最后还割地求和，把涼山等中国领土献给越南，土共从不把真相告诉国内愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓会立马推翻土共非法政府
- 回复 举报 [ 4楼 游客 (184.151.x.x) ] 发表于
- 放屁
3楼 游客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自乐，朝鲜战争丢掉60万志愿军的小命，中越战争50万打越土共从不把真相告诉国内愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓会立马推翻土共非法政府
- 回复 举报 [ 3楼 游客 (198.96.x.x) ] 发表于
- 阿Q自淫自乐，朝鲜战争丢掉60万志愿军的小命，中越战争50万打越南30万，最后还割地求和，把涼山等中国领土献给越南，土共从不把真相告诉国内愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓会立马推翻土共非法政府